FPO Article 19 / 49 / 50This material is communicated only to persons reasonably believed to be Investment Professionals (FPO 2005, Article 19), High Net Worth Companies (Article 49), or Certified Sophisticated Investors (Article 50), and to sovereign agencies, treasury teams, sovereign wealth funds and DFIs acting institutionally. It is not directed at retail clients and is not a financial promotion under FSMA s.21 to such persons.
NATDAQ · Natural Capital Exchange · A division of EPC Holdings Ltd · Sovereign issued · Validated · Authorised
NNATDAQ
Sovereign · Europe · Eastern Europe

Russia

What NATDAQ unlocks for the country — the asset stays sovereign, participating farmers and communities receive a defined share of the cashflow, and institutions take an equitable share alongside them. Per-asset economics, jobs, GDP uplift, and rural-economy impact across 1, 5, 10 and 25-year horizons.

ISO RUSDeveloped market← All sovereigns
Economic finance
$918.4bn
Total NATDAQ-channel financing, 25-year horizon
Finance income
$23.5bn
Annual sovereign cashflow (Conservation + MSW)
Materials
$3.1tn
Cumulative timber value, 25-year horizon
Carbon
$20.3bn
Creditable flux NPV · 40 GtCO₂e stock
QG value
3.7m jobs · $2.2tn GDP
Quantitative growth contribution, 25y
Asset class · Conservation

11.5% of Russia's land is under protection.

The Conservation Note is priced at a sovereign-floor of $100/ha/year, written on a 20-year tenor. Stacking a new tranche each year creates permanent conservation funding. Revenue is generated 50% from sustainable forestry within the conserved estate and 50% from ecosystem-service outcomes — carbon, ESG, SDG, CSR, water, and sustainability programmes.

Protected area
1.9m km²
188,334,005 ha
Sovereign floor
$100/ha/yr
Auditable line-by-hectare
Annual sovereign revenue
$18.8bn
Across 188,334,005 ha
Note tenor
20-year
Stack annually for permanent conservation
Note PV per stack
$234.7bn
One annual issuance
Forestry component
$9.4bn
50% of annual revenue
Ecosystem outcome component
$9.4bn
50% — carbon · ESG · SDG · CSR · water
Direct management jobs
376.7k
Rangers + protected-area staff
Total jobs (incl. indirect)
565k
Including downstream
GDP uplift (25y)
$586.8bn
Sovereign multiplier applied
Marine PA share
2.2%
Of territorial waters
Asset class · Forestry

8.2m km² of forest. 49.8% of Russia.

Each Tree Note is sized as a defined fraction of the projected harvest value of its species over the rotation period. The majority of note proceeds flows directly to participating farmers as working capital ahead of harvest; the farmer also retains a fixed share of the harvest revenue at maturity. The structure is designed so capital reaches the ground, not administrative overhead.

Top 25 tree species — current and forecast value
Top 25 catalogue: full per-tree fill is researcher commission (see methodology)
SpeciesArea (km²)Current annual marketFuture market (25y)Tree Note valueQG market valueRotation (y)Data
Scots pine
Pinus sylvestris
1,150,000$21.4bn$534.8bn$465.8bn$1.1tn100Indicative
Dahurian larch
Larix gmelinii
1,600,000$17.6bn$440bn$384bn$883.2bn130Indicative
Silver birch
Betula pendula
600,000$15.6bn$390bn$348bn$800.4bn70Indicative
Siberian larch
Larix sibirica
700,000$14.7bn$367.5bn$367.5bn$845.2bn100Deep
Norway spruce
Picea abies
350,000$8.4bn$210bn$182bn$418.6bn90Indicative
Downy birch
Betula pubescens
350,000$6.3bn$157.5bn$141.8bn$326bn70Indicative
Siberian spruce
Picea obovata
400,000$6bn$150bn$144bn$331.2bn100Deep
European aspen
Populus tremula
250,000$5.3bn$131.3bn$106.3bn$244.4bn55Indicative
Siberian pine
Pinus sibirica
200,000$4.5bn$112.5bn$106.3bn$244.4bn150Deep
Siberian fir
Abies sibirica
280,000$4.4bn$109.2bn$96.6bn$222.2bn90Indicative
Mongolian oak
Quercus mongolica
70,000$2.5bn$63bn$56bn$128.8bn130Indicative
Pedunculate oak
Quercus robur
38,000$2.3bn$57bn$51.3bn$118bn120Indicative
Ajan spruce
Picea ajanensis
90,000$1.5bn$37.8bn$33.1bn$76.1bn110Indicative
Korean pine
Pinus koraiensis
60,000$1.3bn$33bn$28.8bn$66.2bn140Indicative
Small-leaved lime
Tilia cordata
30,000$1.1bn$27bn$22.8bn$52.4bn80Indicative
Black alder
Alnus glutinosa
40,000$1bn$25bn$21bn$48.3bn60Indicative
European ash
Fraxinus excelsior
18,000$936m$23.4bn$20.2bn$46.4bn90Indicative
Khingan fir
Abies nephrolepis
45,000$675m$16.9bn$14.9bn$34.2bn100Indicative
Norway maple
Acer platanoides
14,000$616m$15.4bn$13.2bn$30.3bn80Indicative
Black poplar
Populus nigra
25,000$600m$15bn$12.4bn$28.5bn50Indicative
Manchurian walnut
Juglans mandshurica
7,000$588m$14.7bn$12.6bn$29bn100Indicative
Oriental beech
Fagus orientalis
12,000$360m$9bn$7.7bn$17.8bn110Indicative
European white elm
Ulmus laevis
9,000$256.5m$6.4bn$5.4bn$12.4bn90Indicative
Amur cork tree
Phellodendron amurense
5,000$225m$5.6bn$4.9bn$11.2bn90Indicative
Hornbeam
Carpinus betulus
8,000$204m$5.1bn$4.3bn$9.9bn80Indicative

Current annual market: area × yield × ex-farm price. Future market (25y): sustained-yield total ex-farm value. Tree Note value: sovereign-grade financing the species can support, computed under the EPC structuring model. QG market value: economic contribution to GDP (multiplier applied). CITES II species carry a trade restriction — permit chain-of-custody is required before they can list as freely-tradeable inventory. Per-species areas are planning-grade modelled estimates from national inventory species-composition shares; prices are mid-points of live ranges (tropical hardwood moves 20–40% intra-year on ITTO reports).

Cumulative harvest value (25y)
$3.1tn
Future ex-farm value, all species
Tree Note financing unlocked
$617.8bn
Sovereign-grade institutional capital
Operational capital deployed
$494.2bn
On-the-ground programme spend
Farmer total
$704.2bn
Working capital + harvest revenue
Direct forestry jobs
1.2m
Mechanised silviculture profile
Indirect jobs
1.8m
Sawmill, pulp, panel, transport
GDP uplift (25y)
$1.4tn
Sovereign multiplier applied
Forest trend (decade)
+0.01 pp
2010-2020
Carbon · Flux-based, not stock-priced

Russia's forest carbon — the flux is the asset.

Russia's forests hold 40 GtCO₂e. The forest is a net sink of 230 MtCO₂e/yr — the channel monetises the incremental sequestration beyond business-as-usual. A carbon credit monetises the annual flux, not the standing stock. We report the recurring credit stream and the one-off stock asset value separately, and price against the CCP-labelled nature-based band — explicitly not the EU ETS compliance price.

Recurring credit revenue (the financeable stream)
Addressable flux
230 MtCO₂e/yr
Incremental sink
Additionality factor
40%
Conservative — only beyond BAU is creditable
Buffer + leakage
−25% / −5%
boreal biome (Verra non-permanence + leakage)
Net creditable flux
65.5 MtCO₂e/yr
≈ 0.1 tCO₂e/ha/yr
Nature credit band
$15–35/tCO₂
CCP-labelled nature-based (NOT EU ETS)
Annual credit revenue
$1.4bn
At band mid, net of verification cost
Recurring credit NPV
$20.3bn
25y discounted at 5%
Carbon price as-of
2026-05-01
Refreshed daily when feed connected
Stock asset value (one-off balance-sheet figure — NOT credit income)
Forest carbon stock
40 GtCO₂e
Biomass + soil organic carbon
Stock asset value
$100bn
Band mid, deeply haircut (stock is not saleable)
EU ETS (macro context only)
€75/tCO₂
Compliance market — not used to value forest credits

Method: creditable flux = (project sequestration − baseline) × (1 − leakage) × (1 − buffer), valued as a discounted multi-year cash-flow (IPCC 2019; Verra VM0048 / AFOLU non-permanence tool; ART-TREES; Griscom et al. 2017). Carbon revenue is one component of the Conservation Note's 50% ecosystem-outcome share, alongside ESG, SDG, CSR, water, and sustainability. Stock data: Pan et al. 2024; world's largest forest carbon sink.. Nature-credit price: CCP-labelled nature-based credit band (Verra VM0048 floor + ICVCM premium) (as of 2026-05-01). No live carbon tick is displayed — there is no licence-clean free real-time feed; figures are documented references refreshed on a defined cadence.

Material change · Russia's economic trajectory

With NATDAQ vs without.

Russia's baseline trajectory compounds at 3.0% real GDP growth and 0.0% employment growth — the dashed lines below. The solid lines add the NATDAQ-channel contribution over a 25-year build.

Real GDP, USD trillions
$0.0T$1.3T$2.7T$4.0T$5.3T$6.7TY0Y5Y10Y15Y20Y25USD trillions$4.2T$6.4T
Baseline (3.0% YoY)Baseline + NATDAQ channel
Y25 delta: +$2.2T (+51.9%)

Baseline compounded from 2024 GDP at the country's published real growth rate. NATDAQ contribution is the 25-year cumulative GDP uplift, ramped across the horizon.

Total employment, millions
0.0m15.9m31.8m47.7m63.6m79.5mY0Y5Y10Y15Y20Y25millions of jobs72.0m75.7m
Baseline (0.0% YoY)Baseline + NATDAQ jobs
Y25 delta: +3.7m (+5.2%)

Baseline employment compounded at the country's published rate. NATDAQ contribution is direct + indirect jobs ramped to steady-state over the horizon. Current agricultural workforce: 4.10m.

Baseline data: World Bank WDI 2024 / national statistical offices. NATDAQ contribution derived from the country's natural-capital programme scale and EPC's structuring model. Refresh against latest national accounts before public quotation. Methodology and full assumption registry on the methodology page.

Future timber · Domestic vs export

Where the wood goes — and the value with it.

Tree Note proceeds expand the forested estate; the future harvest serves the domestic processing economy and generates export earnings. Russia's current trade profile sets the directional split.

Current roundwood production
210M m³/yr
Reporting year 2023
Domestic consumption
89%
Sawnwood, pulp, panels for home market
Export share
11%
Raw + processed wood-equivalent
Top destinations
China · Kazakhstan · Uzbekistan
Future domestic value (25y)
$2.7tn
Harvest value retained in country
Future export value (25y)
$339.8bn
Hard-currency earnings
Total cumulative harvest (25y)
$3.1tn
All Tree Note species combined
Trade balance impact
Net positive
Through forestry channel alone

Domestic / export split is the country's current profile applied to the future harvest. As Tree Note proceeds scale plantation area, the absolute value of both columns grows; the split itself can be re-engineered through downstream processing investment funded by the same channel.

Asset class · Municipal Solid Waste

60m t of MSW per year. 410 kg per capita.

The MSW Note securitises a defined sovereign-floor share of the recoverable waste-stream revenue — gate fees, post-sort commodities, and energy recovery — discounted to a 25-year tenor. Capital flows into collection, sorting and processing infrastructure; the income stream funds the note.

Annual generation
60m t
Collection rate
90.0%
Recycling rate
5.0%
Recoverable value
$130/t
Blended gate + commodity + energy
Annual recoverable
$7.8bn
MSW Note PV
$66bn
25-year tenor, sovereign-grade
Direct jobs
36k
Collection, sort, transfer, landfill
Indirect jobs
150k
Recycling, EfW, remanufacturing
Quantitative Growth Forecast

What NATDAQ unlocks for Russia.

Aggregate financing, jobs, and GDP uplift across all four asset classes over four time horizons. All figures derive from the same model assumptions and sources documented in the methodology footer.

HorizonFinancing unlockedOperational capitalDirect jobsIndirect jobsTotal jobsGDP uplift% of country GDPFarmer total
1-year$325.4bn$260.3bn1.6m2.1m3.7m$808.5bn40.42%$28.2bn
5-year$424.2bn$339.4bn1.6m2.1m3.7m$1tn51.79%$140.8bn
10-year$547.8bn$438.2bn1.6m2.1m3.7m$1.3tn66.00%$281.7bn
25-year$918.4bn$734.7bn1.6m2.1m3.7m$2.2tn108.62%$704.2bn
Channel finance · Farmer impact

The farmer's share.

Participating farmers and community land-holders receive working capital upfront — at planting — plus a defined harvest revenue share at maturity. The structure deploys capital to the ground, not into administrative overhead.

Working capital upfront
$395.4bn
Paid at planting
Harvest revenue
$308.9bn
Paid at harvest
Lifetime farmer total
$704.2bn
Participating households
2.6m
Estimated land-holders
Rural-economy spending
$711.6bn
Downstream local consumption
Total jobs (full chain)
3.7m
Post-farming employment

A landing pad for the rural economy.

Traditional agriculture is shrinking under automation, climate pressure, and consolidation. The NATDAQ channel creates skilled rural employment in forestry, conservation management, and waste recovery — work that absorbs displaced farm labour and adds capacity beyond current ag headcount.

Current agricultural workforce
4.10m
5.7% of total employment, 2022
NATDAQ channel — direct jobs (25y)
1.6m
39% of current ag workforce
NATDAQ channel — total jobs (25y)
3.7m
91% of current ag workforce
Reading this

Russia's on-farm workforce of 4.10m faces structural decline. The channel does not displace those workers — it offers a credible re-employment path in plantation establishment, silviculture, ranger management, sorting infrastructure, and processing. ILO modelled.

Returns benchmark · Profit, not cost

Sustainability through profit, not cost.

Institutions participating in the Russia Tree Note take an equitable share of the cashflow — alongside participating farmers and the sovereign. The cashflow share sits against the same return benchmarks as a corporate equity allocation, and uniquely also delivers sustainability metrics, brand value, and shareholder value through profit, not through the cost line.

BenchmarkAnnualised returnSource
NATDAQ Tree Note (this country, sovereign-grade)6.2%Annualised investor cashflow share
Tesco PLC — operating margin on turnover4.9%FY25
Tesco PLC — Return on Capital Employed14.6%FY24/25
US broad market — Return on Invested Capital10.1%Damodaran Jan 2026
US Paper / Forest Products — ROIC10.4%Damodaran Jan 2026
US Farming / Agriculture — ROIC7.7%Damodaran Jan 2026
US REITs (yield comparator) — ROIC3.7%Damodaran Jan 2026
Sustainable timber funds — historical net IRR5.9%GIIN benchmark

ROCE / ROIC reflect each benchmark's published return on capital. The NATDAQ Tree Note figure is the projected annualised investor cashflow share — institutions participate in an equitable share of the cashflow, alongside the participating farmers and the sovereign. Past performance is not indicative of future results; figures are illustrative for institutional discussion.

Cross-channel · Litdaq

Litigation finance channel.

Russia is rated developing on the EPC Litdaq market-depth scale. The cross-channel position lets a sovereign issuer monetise commercial litigation cashflows through the same EPC institutional framework as natural-capital notes.

Market depth
Developing
Legal services / GDP
0.6%
Notes

Significant commercial caseload; cross-border arbitration channel.

The only venue that does this

No other exchange coordinates this trade and data.

Sovereign natural-capital programmes have historically been financed bilaterally — bank by bank, project by project, with no common pricing surface and no institutional secondary market. NATDAQ is the only venue that lists sovereign-grade conservation, forestry, MSW, and litigation finance instruments on a single coordinated, AiGLe-graded surface — with a published per-country dataset, a structuring model that links natural assets to financeable cashflows, and a consistent institutional disclosure standard.

The asset stays on the sovereign balance sheet. The data stays sovereign. Only the cashflow rights are securitised. That coordination is the product.

Approach & sources

How the figures are produced

All financing, jobs and GDP figures are produced by the NATDAQ structuring model — proprietary to EPC Holdings — applied to the country's natural-capital dataset. The model derives Tree Note, Conservation Note, and MSW Note pricing from species, biome, and waste-stream characteristics, and projects on-the-ground capital deployment, sustained employment, and GDP uplift over the note tenor.

Notes are AiGLe-graded prior to listing. The senior sovereign tranche of every NATDAQ-listed instrument is graded under AiGLe's published Four-Pillar analytical framework.

Primary input sources

  • Forest area & change: FAO Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020.
  • Protected area share: World Bank / Protected Planet (UNEP-WCMC).
  • MSW: World Bank What a Waste 2.0; Eurostat for European countries.
  • Sectoral employment intensity: FAO Forest Sector Outlook; ILO sectoral briefs.
  • Ecosystem-service value: de Groot et al. 2012; Costanza et al. 2014.
  • Sovereign multiplier: IMF Fiscal Monitor / IMF WP 20/199.

Per-species market values are indicative ranges from ITTO and FAO sectoral data. Country-specific figures are refined under EPC's structuring engagement prior to issuance. Full structuring methodology and the NATDAQ rulebook are available to qualified institutional counterparties under NDA.